- Features | June 11, 2018
Why Partial Arc Fault Protection Is Not Enough
Each year, arc faults are responsible for more than 28,000 home fires, injuring or killing hundreds of people and
causing more than $700 million in property damage1. Yet, arc fault circuit protection is still only mandated for
70 percent of a home’s electrical circuits. To get closer to 100 percent protection, consumers need to demand
it, and electrical contractors need to get on board.
Required: Fault Protection
The 2017 National Electric Code (NEC) requires arc fault circuit interruption (AFCI) protection for 15- and 20-amp circuits in all areas of new residential construction, excluding bathrooms, garages, and outside areas.
The 2014 and 2017 NEC expanded arc fault interruption into areas where previously only ground fault circuit interruption (GFCI) was required, such as kitchens, utility rooms, and laundry rooms. This is why dual-function circuit breakers, which combine arc fault and ground into one circuit breaker, are recommended.
Since its inception in 1897, the NEC has driven significant safety improvements. From 1980 to 2014, the number of home fires in the U.S. involving electrical malfunctions or failure fell 36 percent, according to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).
However, NEC code adoption varies with just 18 states adopting the 2017 code. More than half of the country currently uses outdated codes from the previous three editions. And three states - Arizona, Missouri, and Mississippi - have not adopted any statewide NEC at all.
The Argument Over Arc Fault
In the late ‘80s and early ‘90s, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) found one-third of electrical fires originated in the branch-circuit wiring systems of homes, which led to the first proposals to require AFCI protection.
AFCIs were first included in the code in the 1999 edition and subsequent editions have expanded the requirement. Much like the introduction of GFCI requirements in the 1970s, without adequate proof of their effectiveness, some have argued against the mandate and even the need forAFCIs. AFCIs are relatively new, and because the AFCI disconnects power when an arc fault occurs, there is no incidence of fire or arc
reported to authorities – or their absence.
AFCI is supported by numerous safety and governing agencies. Still, some builders and contractors argue standard breakers provide adequate protection, so why incur the additional cost of AFCIs? The fact is that standard breakers provide neither GFI nor AFI protection.
Installing Beyond the Code Benefits Everyone
When it comes to electrical projects, contractors have countless decisions to make regarding materials, components, wiring, and so forth. Of course, meeting industry code requirements plays into those decisions. At some point, every contractor has to decide between meeting the minimum requirement or exceeding it. And very often that decision is based on cost.
While AFCIs do cost more than traditional breakers, they add a level of safety regular breakers cannot provide. Additionally, using dual function circuit breakers can help electrical contractors finish projects on time and on budget by eliminating the need to install two separate devices in areas that require both AFCI and GFCI.
A Reputation for Safety Is its Own Reward
The bottom line guides many business decisions, but should it be the barometer by which we determine the personal